Will the house need to be cleaned again, or did the mother and father spontaneously invite themselves? Regardless of the occasion, a vacuum will certainly clean your home rapidly. You will discover which device fits your needs within our Techtogather overview. Would you like a vacuum without or with a bag? Should it use a cable, in other words, have a battery? Do you want a unique model due to the house dust allergy? When searching for the best device, you’re spoiled for choice. To make your mind up just a little simpler, we required a closer inspection of various corded vacuums recognized by Stiftung Warentest. We demonstrate which models are helpful within our Techtogather comparison.
All models at a glance
- Bosch BGB75X494: Our top recommendation ( 170 euros at Amazon )
If you’re battling by having an allergy in your four walls, you can prevent it using the Bosch vacuum.
- Rowenta RO 3953 EA: Our price-performance tip ( 110 euros at Saturn )
Using the Rowenta vacuum, you receive a good and, most importantly, cheap alternative, despite some compromises.
- Miele Complete C3 Silence EcoLine: Energy-saving winner ( 220 euros at MediaMarkt )
More than 230 euros, the Miele model isn’t cheap; however, it impresses using its hygiene and occasional power consumption.
- Philips PowerPro Expert FC9741/09: more sustainable without a bag ( 170 euros at Amazon )
Although Philips doesn’t make use of the bag using the chic PowerPro Expert, it reduces waste.
Bosch: For more hygiene
Bosch BGB75X494 (Blue)
To declare a fight against house dust allergic reactions, the vacuum from Bosch is proper.
- Very hygienic because of the bag
- Great coverage
- Very quiet
- Moderate performance on carpet and edges
The first device within our overview is helpful for everybody affected by a home dust allergy. Because of its bag, the Bosch vacuum is much more hygienic than models with no load. Because the entire bag is emptied, you enter into a limited connection with the drawn-in dust – an excellent choice for allergy sufferers. The vacuum bag also belongs within the residual waste. Additionally to the plethora of almost 15 meters, Stiftung Warentest praises the suction turn on different surfaces: the Bosch vacuum will get just about everything, only on carpets isn’t it compelling. You will get the vacuum online, which has 763 watts, for approximately 200 euros. Like other vacuums within our selection, you will find attachments for various floors, furniture, upholstery, and joints.
Incidentally: If you’re battling an allergy, the DHA (Deutsche Haus- und Allergiehilfe eV) has come up with some suggestions and information about how to rid your house of allergens higher. For instance, mite-proof duvet bedding could be a means to fix ensure better and healthier sleep.
Rowenta: Inexpensive lightweight
Rowenta RO3953 Compact Power (Red)
If you don’t want to spend lots of cash on the vacuum, you can purchase the Rowenta having a clear conscience. For under 100 euros you receive a solid performance.
- Robust processing
- Very absorbent, but…
- This sometimes complicated handling
- High power consumption
- Cable period of just below 9 meters
It’s unnecessary to spend 200 euros on any excellent vacuum, and you will get our cost tip from Rowenta for under 100 euros ( see Saturn ). Based on the reviews at Saturn, it’s very effective at full power, meaning you sometimes take some strength to deal with it. Additionally, based on Stiftung Warentest, it just performs adequately in difficult-to-achieve corners within the apartment. However, the bag vacuum may be lightweight within our overview at 4.9 kg; other devices weigh over 7 kg.
The ability to use the Rowenta vacuum is very high, creating almost 818 watts. With no: a more remarkable performance does not necessarily mean the vacuum sucks better. The “interaction of device, suction pipe, nozzle design and air path” is pertinent (source: Federal Atmosphere Agency). So make compromises here, in addition to using the rather cheap-searching design. However, if you don’t attach much importance to this and are searching for any device for any small budget, there is also a good option within the Rowenta.
Miele: An investment that pays off
Miele Complete C3 Silence EcoLine (lotus white)
For 240 euros, the vacuum from Miele isn’t a bargain but cuts an excellent estimate for the exam by Stiftung Warentest.
- Low energy consumption
- Hygienic thanks to the bag
- Robust processing
- Moderate performance on edges
Using the Miele vacuum, you receive another model having a bag that, based on Stiftung Warentest, scores perfectly in just about all test criteria, but most importantly, using its sturdiness. However, the testers complain about its suction power because it does not always catch everything on the edges. However, having a measured creation of only 550 watts, it consumes little electricity because of its eco-balance. Around 230 euros ( see MediaMarkt ), the Miele is easily the most costly model within our overview. However, a vacuum is another lengthy-term purchase that may be well worth the money.
Philips: Chic, but with compromises
Philips PowerPro Expert FC9741/09 (Black)
The bagless vacuum from Philips looks excellent across the outdoors but is complicated regarding handling.
- less garbage
- Robust processing
- Chic design
- Moderate performance on carpet
- High power consumption
- Complicated handling
If you’re searching for any bagless vacuum, the PowerPro Expert model from Philips has got the edge in Stiftung Warentest. It does not suck the dust right into a bag but into a dust container. You can empty it and reuse it. Even though this is the more excellent sustainable option when compared to bag models, it’s less hygienic. Being an accessory, the Philips model provides the same nozzles because yet another carpet nozzle supplements the devices proven above. However, Stiftung Warentest criticizes the handling since it cannot suck crumbs from the carpet very well, and it is hard to empty. Additionally, by creating almost 920 watts, the model includes a much greater power consumption than our other recommendations. So make compromises with this particular test champion. Still, at well under 200 euros ( view at Amazon . com ), it’s again a less expensive model – and it is chic design immediately catches the attention.
Cable or battery – which is more sustainable?
Within our selection, you’ve already seen that you could focus on sustainability despite vacuums. But could it be so sustainable to still depend on corded vacuums once the trend is increasingly towards cordless vacuums? Stiftung Warentest, therefore, required a closer inspection of the existence cycle assessment of corded and cordless vacuums. They evaluated the existence cycle from the devices known as ecological damage points, which comprise production, transport, use, and disposal factors. The testers deducted: “Using their power consumption alone, cable vacuums accumulate nearly as many damage points as cordless vacuums over all of their existence cycle.” However, this only applies when the vacuum can be used at full power. Should you reduce this, less energy is consumed. However, the device might not work in addition to a result.
An additional advantage of the cordless vacuum would be that the battery could be replaced generally. When the device surrenders the ghost sooner or later, the whole vacuum doesn’t always need to be discarded, just the battery. Within the comparison, Stiftung Warentest also causes it to be evident that social effects concerning the manufacture of rechargeable batteries weren’t considered. However, many the important when removing lithium and cobalt relevant for the output of batteries. Mining lithium in (mainly) South USA, whether for cordless vacuums, e-cars, or smartphones, pollutes and cuts down groundwater. This affects not only nature and wildlife but also the (indigenous) population.Additionally, cobalt mining is belittled – illegal child labor is among what exactly . When evaluating corded and cordless vacuums, settle on those points. Especially about sustainability, the social aspect is a significant one. Cordless vacuums can be observed critically, but corded vacuums also provide disadvantages.
That’s how we chose
With household appliances, for example, vacuums, you can rapidly explore the extensive range, even though you limit yourself to ultimately corded vacuums. To make an appropriate selection of the numerous products, we’ve based ourselves around the outcomes of Stiftung Warentest – reviews and links are highlighted below. The ratings of users also influence the choice. The second was helpful because they do not judge according to benchmark figures and laboratory values but convey personal impressions.